Amazon technical interviews are renowned for their rigor, testing candidates’ problem-solving skills, algorithmic thinking, and the ability to handle follow-up questions under pressure. The stakes are even higher for international candidates, who must navigate language barriers and cultural differences while maintaining technical precision. In this article, we’ll analyze a classic Amazon interview problem, exploring how CSOAHELP’s real-time support enables candidates to confidently tackle challenging questions and deliver their best performance.
Problem Statement
The interviewer begins by presenting the following problem:
"You are given an integer array coins representing coins of different denominations and an integer amount representing a total amount of money. Return the fewest number of coins that you need to make up that amount. If that amount of money cannot be made up by any combination of the coins, return -1. You may assume that you have an infinite number of each kind of coin."
The interviewer provides examples to clarify the requirements:
- Example 1:
Input: coins = [1, 2, 5], amount = 11
Output: 3
Explanation: 11 = 5 + 5 + 1 - Example 2:
Input: coins = [2], amount = 3
Output: -1 - Example 3:
Input: coins = [1], amount = 0
Output: 0
The interviewer emphasizes: "This problem assesses your ability to design efficient algorithms capable of handling edge cases and large inputs."
Clarifying the Problem
CSOAHELP immediately provides a behind-the-scenes reminder: “Ask about edge cases and constraints like empty arrays or negative values.” Acting on this prompt, the candidate begins to ask clarification questions:
- Candidate: "Are there cases where the input array
coinsmight be empty, or theamountmight be negative?" - Interviewer: "No, you can assume the input is always valid. The
coinsarray will contain at least one positive integer, and theamountwill be a non-negative integer."
The candidate continues:
- Candidate: "Is the order of coins in the array significant? For example, are they guaranteed to be sorted?"
- Interviewer: "You can assume the order is arbitrary, but your algorithm should not depend on it."
Through this exchange, the candidate clarifies the problem’s boundaries, avoiding misunderstandings later in the implementation.
Communicating the Solution Approach
The candidate now begins explaining their initial solution idea:
- Candidate: "This problem can be solved using dynamic programming. I would create a
dparray of sizeamount + 1, wheredp[i]represents the minimum number of coins needed to make up the amounti. The base case isdp[0] = 0, and all other entries can be initialized to infinity. Then, for each coin in the array, I would iterate through thedparray and update its values. For instance, if the current coin iscoin, the formula for updating would bedp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[i - coin] + 1)."
CSOAHELP provides a keyword prompt: “Explain the dynamic programming principle and bottom-up computation.” The candidate incorporates this into their explanation:
- Candidate: "This approach ensures that each subproblem is solved optimally before moving on to the next one. The bottom-up nature avoids redundant calculations, making it efficient."
The interviewer responds with a follow-up:
- Interviewer: "Your explanation is clear. Could you elaborate on how you ensure the correctness of this approach for edge cases?"
The candidate answers confidently:
- Candidate: "By initializing
dpto infinity, we can easily identify amounts that cannot be made up with the given coins. For example, ifdp[amount]remains infinity after processing all coins, it means the amount is not achievable. Additionally, the iterative nature ensures all possible combinations are considered."
Follow-Up Questions and Challenges
The interviewer moves to more complex questions:
- Interviewer: "What is the time and space complexity of your approach? Can it be optimized further?"
The candidate answers:
- Candidate: "The time complexity is O(n * m), where
nis theamountandmis the number of coins, as we iterate through thedparray for each coin. The space complexity is O(n) because we use an array of sizeamount + 1to store intermediate results."
CSOAHELP intervenes with a prompt: “Mention rolling arrays to optimize space complexity.” The candidate incorporates this suggestion:
- Candidate: "We can optimize space complexity to O(m) by using a rolling array, retaining only the current and previous states during updates. This would reduce memory usage significantly while maintaining correctness."
The interviewer presses further:
- Interviewer: "If the number of coins is very large, say hundreds of denominations, how would your algorithm scale? Could other approaches be considered?"
The candidate thoughtfully responds:
- Candidate: "For cases with a large number of coins, performance may degrade due to the additional iterations. In scenarios where the
amountis relatively small, a greedy algorithm could provide a quick approximation, although it doesn’t guarantee the optimal solution. For more flexibility, a divide-and-conquer approach might also help handle specific cases more efficiently."
Behavioral Questions
After discussing the technical solution, the interviewer shifts to a behavioral question:
- Interviewer: "Can you share an example of a time when you solved a challenging technical problem under tight deadlines?"
CSOAHELP suggests a STAR method structure (Situation, Task, Action, Result) through a behind-the-scenes prompt. The candidate responds:
- Candidate: "In my previous role, we were tasked with building a payment processing module in just two weeks. The existing solution had performance issues, so I analyzed the bottlenecks and proposed a new algorithm to improve query performance. I worked late hours, collaborated with the team, and thoroughly tested the new implementation. As a result, we reduced processing time by 40% and delivered the project ahead of schedule."
The interviewer follows up:
- Interviewer: "How did you handle disagreements within the team during this process?"
- Candidate: "There were initial disagreements about the feasibility of my proposal. I prepared a detailed performance comparison and presented it to the team, addressing their concerns. This collaborative approach helped us reach consensus and strengthened team trust."
The Role of CSOAHELP
Throughout this high-stakes interview, CSOAHELP played a crucial role in the candidate’s success by providing real-time, unobtrusive assistance:
- Clarifying Questions: Prompting the candidate to confirm edge cases and constraints, avoiding missteps in understanding the problem.
- Solution Structuring: Suggesting dynamic programming keywords and structured explanations, enabling the candidate to articulate their approach with clarity and confidence.
- Follow-Up Handling: Offering optimization insights, such as rolling arrays and alternative algorithms, to help the candidate tackle deeper challenges.
- Behavioral Responses: Guiding the candidate with STAR method tips to deliver compelling and structured answers to non-technical questions.
Conclusion
Amazon’s technical interviews are designed to push candidates to their limits, testing both technical prowess and communication skills. With CSOAHELP’s real-time support, candidates can confidently address complex problems, handle follow-up questions, and showcase their best selves. For international job seekers, CSOAHELP is not just an interview aid—it’s a game-changer that levels the playing field and opens doors to career success.
经过csoahelp的面试辅助，候选人获取了良好的面试表现。如果您需要面试辅助或面试代面服务，帮助您进入梦想中的大厂，请随时联系我。
If you need more interview support or interview proxy practice, feel free to contact us. We offer comprehensive interview support services to help you successfully land a job at your dream company.
